About the library
Independent, sceptical, and readable
BioAmplified exists because the peptide information landscape is split between impenetrable papers and unaccountable marketing. We sit deliberately in the middle: rigorous about sources, honest about limits, and written so that a curious beginner can follow every paragraph.
What we hold ourselves to
Three rules govern everything published here — from a one-line glossary entry to a full compound dossier.
Primary sources first
Every dossier is built from published literature and named sources. Where evidence is only preclinical, or only anecdotal, we say so plainly rather than dressing it up.
No hype, no dosing promises
We reproduce dosing figures from research and practice for education, and we label them as such. We never tell a reader to take anything.
Written for two readers at once
Beginners should be able to follow any page, and experienced readers should still find depth. If a page fails either test, it gets rewritten.
Supplier partners, disclosed everywhere
BioAmplified is funded by affiliate commissions. We list a supplier only after reviewing their documentation, third-party testing and how they answer hard questions.
What a partner must do
- Publish third-party certificates of analysis for every batch.
- State clearly that products are for research use, not human consumption.
- Answer questions about purity, sourcing and sterility in writing.
- Never ask us to soften a safety note or remove a limitation.
Partners have no editorial input. If a supplier fails these tests, their links come down.
Corrections, suggestions, partnerships
If we got something wrong, we want to know — corrections are published rather than quietly edited. You can also suggest a compound for review or ask about supplier partnerships.
Messages land straight with the editorial team. We read everything, and we reply when a correction affects published content.